Which food has less impact on blood sugar?
Beef Hash, Beef
Vietti Foods Company, Inc.Hash
Tops Markets, LlcComparing Key Nutrients
| Nutrient | Beef Hash, Beef | Hash |
|---|---|---|
| Carbs | 27.0g | 22.0g |
| Sugars | 3.0g | 1.0g |
| Fiber | 2.0g | 1.9g |
| Protein | 16.0g | 18.0g |
| Fat | 41.0g | 24.0g |
Estimated Blood Sugar Response
Beef Hash, Beef vs Hash comparison: Beef Hash, Beef has a high blood sugar impact (BSI 48.4) while Hash has high impact (BSI 39.0). Beef Hash, Beef contains 5.0g more carbs per serving. Consider Hash for better blood sugar control.
Medical Disclaimer: This data is an estimate intended for educational purposes only. Individual responses to foods may vary significantly. Always consult with your healthcare provider for medical advice related to your specific condition.
Beef Hash, Beef
Hash
Community Blood Sugar Responses
Real people share how these foods actually affected their blood sugar levels. Click to add your own experience.
Nutritional Labels
This section compares the nutritional labels of the two foods.
Beef Hash, Beef
Serving size 283.0 Gg
% Daily Value*
* Some fat components may not be available in USDA data
* 22.0g of carbohydrates not detailed in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
BEEF, WATER, REHYDRATED POTATOES, SALT, SUGAR, SPICE, FLAVORINGS, SODIUM NITRITE.
Hash
Serving size 236.0 Gg
% Daily Value*
* Some fat components may not be available in USDA data
* 19.1g of carbohydrates not detailed in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
BEEF, REHYDRATED POTATOES, WATER, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF SALT, SUGAR, FLAVORING, SPICES, SODIUM NITRITE.
Vitamins & Minerals Comparison
Compare the vitamin and mineral content of both foods as percentage of daily values.
Beef Hash, Beef
Vitamins
Minerals
Hash
Minerals
Food Tags
These tags help categorize foods based on their ingredients and effects on blood sugar levels.
Beef Hash, Beef Tags
Hash Tags
Data Quality
This section compares the data quality and source information for both foods.
About Our Food Data
All nutritional data comes from the USDA Food Database. Some branded products contain self-reported information that may not be perfectly accurate. Food details are inherently difficult to measure precisely, so we do our best to provide reliable information and use the data quality scores below to help you assess accuracy.
Report Data Issues for Beef Hash, Beef
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Report Data Issues for Hash
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this food category and how to use these foods for diabetes management
The key difference is in their blood sugar impact: Beef Hash, Beef has a BSI of 48.4 while Hash has a BSI of 39.0. Hash has the lower blood sugar impact, making it potentially better for blood glucose management.
Hash appears to be the better choice for diabetics with a lower BSI score of 39.0. However, consider your individual response, portion sizes, and overall meal composition when making food choices.
Beef Hash, Beef contains 9.5g of carbohydrates per 100g, while Hash contains 9.3g per 100g. Both foods have similar carbohydrate content.
Beef Hash, Beef provides 0.7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0.8g in Hash. Both foods provide similar amounts of fiber.
Use this comparison to make informed substitutions in your meals. The food with the lower BSI score will generally have less impact on your blood sugar. Consider pairing higher-impact foods with protein or fiber to help moderate blood glucose response.
Yes! Use our comparison tool to explore other foods in similar categories. You can also browse the chili & stew category to find more alternatives and make additional comparisons.