Which food has less impact on blood sugar?
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices
Tyson Foods Inc.Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz
Conagra Brands IncComparing Key Nutrients
| Nutrient | Steak Eze Re... | Slim Jim Bar... |
|---|---|---|
| Carbs | 2.9g | 4.0g |
| Sugars | 0.9g | 1.0g |
| Fiber | 0.4g | 1.0g |
| Protein | 7.5g | 6.0g |
| Fat | 2.6g | 11.0g |
Estimated Blood Sugar Response
Compare Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices vs Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz: Both have similar blood sugar impact with BSI scores of 4.9 and 5.4 respectively. Choose based on your nutritional preferences and portion size for optimal blood sugar management.
Medical Disclaimer: This data is an estimate intended for educational purposes only. Individual responses to foods may vary significantly. Always consult with your healthcare provider for medical advice related to your specific condition.
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices
Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz
Community Blood Sugar Responses
Real people share how these foods actually affected their blood sugar levels. Click to add your own experience.
Nutritional Labels
This section compares the nutritional labels of the two foods.
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices
Serving size 56.0 GRMg
% Daily Value*
* 1.6g of carbohydrates not detailed in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
CHICKEN MEAT, WATER, SEASONING [SUGAR, PAPRIKA (COLOR), SALT, MALTODEXTRIN, CAYENNE PEPPER SAUCE POWDER (AGED RED PEPPERS, DISTILLED VINEGAR, SALT, GARLIC), CITRIC ACID, DRY VINEGAR FLAVOR (SODIUM DIACETATE, CITRIC ACID, POTASSIUM CITRATE, AND GLUCONA-DELTA-LACTONE), CHILI PEPPER, PALM OIL, HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN, PALM, COCONUT, AND/OR COTTONSEED OILS, NATURAL FLAVORS (CONTAINS MILK), RENDERED CHICKEN FAT, SOYBEAN OIL, HONEY SOLIDS, DEHYDRATED CHICKEN BROTH, SUNFLOWER OIL], SOY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, MODIFIED FOOD STARCH, SODIUM PHOSPHATES, SALT. COATED WITH: WATER, MALTODEXTRIN, SUGAR, PAPRIKA (COLOR), FOOD STARCH - MODIFIED, CAYENNE PEPPER SAUCE POWDER (AGED RED PEPPERS, DISTILLED VINEGAR, SALT, GARLIC), CHILI PEPPER, CITRIC ACID, NATURAL FLAVORS (CONTAINS MILK), WHITE DISTILLED VINEGAR, XANTHAN GUM, RENDERED CHICKEN FAT, HONEY SOLIDS, DEHYDRATED CHICKEN BROTH.
Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz
Serving size 28.0 GRMg
% Daily Value*
* 2.0g of carbohydrates not detailed in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
BEEF, PORK, MECHANICALLY SEPARATED CHICKEN, WATER, TEXTURED SOY FLOUR, CORN SYRUP, CONTAINS LESS THAN 2% OF: SALT, DEXTROSE, SUGAR, NATURAL FLAVORS INCLUDING SMOKE, MOLASSES POWDER (MOLASSES, MALTODEXTRIN), TOMATO POWDER, MALTODEXTRIN, CAYENNE PEPPER SAUCE POWDER (CAYENNE PEPPER SAUCE [AGED CAYENNE PEPPERS, VINEGAR, SALT, GARLIC]), PAPRIKA, WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE POWDER (WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE [CORN SYRUP SOLIDS, SALT, CARAMEL COLOR, GARLIC, SUGAR, SPICES, SOY SAUCE SOLIDS [NATURALLY FERMENTED WHEAT AND SOYBEAN, SALT, MALTODEXTRIN, CARAMEL COLOR], PALM OIL, TAMARIND, NATURAL FLAVOR), CITRIC ACID, DISODIUM INOSINATE & DISODIUM GUANYLATE, EXTRACTIVES OF PAPRIKA, SPICES, LACTIC ACID STARTER CULTURE, MALT EXTRACT, SODIUM NITRITE, SOY LECITHIN. CONTAINS: SOY, WHEAT.
Vitamins & Minerals Comparison
Compare the vitamin and mineral content of both foods as percentage of daily values.
Steak Eze Redi Steak B...
Vitamins
Minerals
Slim Jim Barbeque Stic...
Vitamins
Minerals
Data Quality
This section compares the data quality and source information for both foods.
About Our Food Data
All nutritional data comes from the USDA Food Database. Some branded products contain self-reported information that may not be perfectly accurate. Food details are inherently difficult to measure precisely, so we do our best to provide reliable information and use the data quality scores below to help you assess accuracy.
Report Data Issues for Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Report Data Issues for Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this food category and how to use these foods for diabetes management
The key difference is in their blood sugar impact: Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices has a BSI of 4.9 while Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz has a BSI of 5.4. Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices has the lower blood sugar impact, making it potentially better for blood glucose management.
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices appears to be the better choice for diabetics with a lower BSI score of 4.9. However, consider your individual response, portion sizes, and overall meal composition when making food choices.
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices contains 5.2g of carbohydrates per 100g, while Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz contains 14.3g per 100g. Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices has 9.1g fewer carbs, which may result in less blood sugar impact.
Steak Eze Redi Steak Buffalo Chicken Philly Style Slices provides 0.7g of fiber per 100g, compared to 3.6g in Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz. Slim Jim Barbeque Stick, 0.97 Oz provides 2.9g more fiber, which can help slow glucose absorption.
Use this comparison to make informed substitutions in your meals. The food with the lower BSI score will generally have less impact on your blood sugar. Consider pairing higher-impact foods with protein or fiber to help moderate blood glucose response.
Yes! Use our comparison tool to explore other foods in similar categories. You can also browse the meat/poultry/other animals prepared/processed category to find more alternatives and make additional comparisons.