Which food has less impact on blood sugar?
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can
Conagra Brands, IncPaczki, Lemon
Bake Crafters Food CompanyComparing Key Nutrients
| Nutrient | J Hungerford... | Paczki, Lemon |
|---|---|---|
| Carbs | 12.0g | 21.0g |
| Sugars | 10.0g | 6.0g |
| Fiber | 2.0g | 0.0g |
| Protein | 1.0g | 3.0g |
| Fat | 19.0g | 7.0g |
Estimated Blood Sugar Response
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can vs Paczki, Lemon: Significant difference in blood sugar impact. Paczki, Lemon has high impact (BSI 40.8) compared to J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can's moderate impact (BSI 18.1). Paczki, Lemon contains 9.0g more carbs per serving, J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can provides 2.0g more fiber. J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can is the better choice for diabetic meal planning.
Medical Disclaimer: This data is an estimate intended for educational purposes only. Individual responses to foods may vary significantly. Always consult with your healthcare provider for medical advice related to your specific condition.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can
Paczki, Lemon
Community Blood Sugar Responses
Real people share how these foods actually affected their blood sugar levels. Click to add your own experience.
Nutritional Labels
This section compares the nutritional labels of the two foods.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can
Serving size 32.0 GRMg
% Daily Value*
* Some fat components may not be available in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
HYDROGENATED COCONUT OIL, SUGAR, COCOA, LESS THAN 2% OF: SOY LECITHIN, ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR. CONTAINS: SOY.
Paczki, Lemon
Serving size 57.0 Gg
% Daily Value*
* Some fat components may not be available in USDA data
* 15.0g of carbohydrates not detailed in USDA data
* The % Daily Value (DV) tells you how much a nutrient in a serving of food contributes to a daily diet. 2,000 calories a day is used for general nutrition advice.
INGREDIENTS:
ENRICHED BLEACHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID) WATER, PALM OIL, SUGAR, SOYBEAN OIL, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: LEAVENING (SODIUM BICARBONATE, SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE), SOY FLOUR, WHEY, (MILK), SALT, SOY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, GUAR GUM, SODIUM STEAROYL LACTYLATE, SOY LECITHIN, ASCORBIC ACID, COLORED WITH TURMERIC AND ANNATTO, UNBLEACHED ENRICHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID) ENZYMES, CALCIUM PROPIONATE (PRESERVATIVE), YEAST, MONO- AND DIGLYCERIDES WITH ANTIOXIDANTS (TOCOPHEROLS, CITRIC ACID), CANOLA OIL, EGG, CINNAMON. FILLING CONTAINS: WATER, SUGAR, DEXTROSE, FOOD STARCH-MODIFIED, PALM OIL, LEMON PUREE, CITRIC ACID, SODIUM CITRATE, SALT, SORBIC ACID (PRESERVATIVE), AGAR, LEMON OIL, FD&C YELLOW #5, FD&C YELLOW #6.
Vitamins & Minerals Comparison
Compare the vitamin and mineral content of both foods as percentage of daily values.
J Hungerford Smith Cho...
Minerals
Paczki, Lemon
Minerals
Food Tags
These tags help categorize foods based on their ingredients and effects on blood sugar levels.
Medical Disclaimer: These are diet tags generated automatically. We do our best to make sure they're accurate, but please double-check important dietary information. Always consult with your healthcare provider for medical advice related to your specific dietary needs.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can Tags
Paczki, Lemon Tags
Data Quality
This section compares the data quality and source information for both foods.
About Our Food Data
All nutritional data comes from the USDA Food Database. Some branded products contain self-reported information that may not be perfectly accurate. Food details are inherently difficult to measure precisely, so we do our best to provide reliable information and use the data quality scores below to help you assess accuracy.
Report Data Issues for J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Report Data Issues for Paczki, Lemon
Notice something wrong with this food's data? Help us improve by reporting any inaccuracies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this food category and how to use these foods for diabetes management
The key difference is in their blood sugar impact: J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can has a BSI of 18.1 while Paczki, Lemon has a BSI of 40.8. J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can has the lower blood sugar impact, making it potentially better for blood glucose management.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can appears to be the better choice for diabetics with a lower BSI score of 18.1. However, consider your individual response, portion sizes, and overall meal composition when making food choices.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can contains 37.5g of carbohydrates per 100g, while Paczki, Lemon contains 36.8g per 100g. Both foods have similar carbohydrate content.
J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can provides 6.2g of fiber per 100g, compared to 0.0g in Paczki, Lemon. J Hungerford Smith Chocolate Cone Coating, 6/#10 Can provides 6.2g more fiber, which can help slow glucose absorption.
Use this comparison to make informed substitutions in your meals. The food with the lower BSI score will generally have less impact on your blood sugar. Consider pairing higher-impact foods with protein or fiber to help moderate blood glucose response.
Yes! Use our comparison tool to explore other foods in similar categories. You can also browse the desserts/dessert sauces/toppings category to find more alternatives and make additional comparisons.